Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754762AbdFLQin (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jun 2017 12:38:43 -0400 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:54708 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753065AbdFLQij (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jun 2017 12:38:39 -0400 Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 17:38:14 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Shawn Lin , Jeffy Chen , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Mark Rutland , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Brian Norris , Heiko Stuebner , Doug Anderson , linux-spi , "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." , Rob Herring , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Message-ID: <20170612163814.rgbvb54hgxsdj6tf@sirena.org.uk> References: <1497248057-16550-1-git-send-email-jeffy.chen@rock-chips.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="v4puphklnlp5dxxt" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: dpkg has bugs? no way! User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170306 (1.8.0) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:470:1f1d:6b5::3 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] spi: rockchip: add support for "cs-gpios" dts property X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk); Unknown failure Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1450 Lines: 42 --v4puphklnlp5dxxt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 10:18:06AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 9:15 AM, Shawn Lin wrote: > > On 2017/6/12 14:14, Jeffy Chen wrote: > >> +static int rockchip_spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi) > >> +{ > >> + int ret = 0; > >> + unsigned long flags = (spi->mode & SPI_CS_HIGH) ? > >> + GPIOF_OUT_INIT_LOW : GPIOF_OUT_INIT_HIGH; > >> + struct rockchip_spi_data *data = spi_get_ctldata(spi); > >> + > >> + if (!gpio_is_valid(spi->cs_gpio)) > >> + return 0; > > return -EINVAL? > Isn't this check meant to fall back to hardware CS if no cs-gpios property > is present? I'd expect it to, otherwise the cs-gpios property is actualy mandatory. --v4puphklnlp5dxxt Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCAAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAlk+w3UACgkQJNaLcl1U h9DnCgf+OXg2QggBSu3RqoWjZVm0900QROcD7N8+ji9tg5o2HlW11YKPh7FkgdYf UmQBFFfXP4PBvAztwodoGXFxL4s6WcUhf5xvGr0F0CXEThlI3ljWUYXyFVOm60BX pTSUiQgToe4Z5lnMcc17T5cQ54TFNYFsP5b4U+bM4ZfVwCqbGyTSI8itXkh9eAxA gHNkATAQgRfFtuJvo0jgryOA0cLZj7wqMWqSpk2H6V2LwuOR9bdhL36vRLt6DZP6 vUaCl99sA3IFyk70stYbuFpn9/f1U/TQjLP8UJvHKuR5TQhjERXo83BXC0tmbDKE /QH6k+n6SzyBi5zLZnkurv0e523LUA== =Vd63 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --v4puphklnlp5dxxt--