Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 1 Mar 2001 15:35:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 1 Mar 2001 15:33:47 -0500 Received: from [194.213.32.137] ([194.213.32.137]:3332 "EHLO bug.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 1 Mar 2001 15:30:55 -0500 Message-ID: <20010301003347.B1319@bug.ucw.cz> Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 00:33:47 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Alan Cox , "Manfred H. Winter" Cc: Linux Kernel List Subject: Re: [2.4.2-ac5] X (4.0.1) crashes In-Reply-To: <20010227150830.A739@marvin.mahowi.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93i In-Reply-To: ; from Alan Cox on Wed, Feb 28, 2001 at 12:32:26AM +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > > I use XFree86 4.0.1 with nvidia-drivers 0.96. > > Take it up with nvidia. Obfuscated effectively binary only code isnt anyone > elses problem Is it legal, BTW? Obfuscated drivers should _not_ be linked into kernel, because they are not "form preferable for editing". The source code for a work means the preferred form of the work for making modifications to it. For an executable work, complete source So nvidia drivers *are* binary only, as far as GPL is concerned. They should never be linked into kernel. [Or, someone should get kernel with nvidia drivers compiled in from nvidia, and then ask them for sources :-)] Pavel -- I'm pavel@ucw.cz. "In my country we have almost anarchy and I don't care." Panos Katsaloulis describing me w.r.t. patents at discuss@linmodems.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/