Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752361AbdFMJ7A (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2017 05:59:00 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:41282 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751888AbdFMJ67 (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2017 05:58:59 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC v4 00/20] Speculative page faults To: Michal Hocko Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, peterz@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, kirill@shutemov.name, ak@linux.intel.com, dave@stgolabs.net, jack@suse.cz, Matthew Wilcox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, haren@linux.vnet.ibm.com, khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com, npiggin@gmail.com, bsingharora@gmail.com References: <1497018069-17790-1-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20170609150126.GI21764@dhcp22.suse.cz> <83cf1566-3e76-d3fa-10a8-d83bbf9fd568@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20170609163520.GB9332@dhcp22.suse.cz> From: Laurent Dufour Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 11:58:50 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170609163520.GB9332@dhcp22.suse.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: fr Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 17061309-0016-0000-0000-000004BB90C2 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 17061309-0017-0000-0000-000027EC942E Message-Id: <04119fc4-2e7c-a56d-db4c-23860e6cc9a0@linux.vnet.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2017-06-13_06:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1703280000 definitions=main-1706130178 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 925 Lines: 22 On 09/06/2017 18:35, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Fri 09-06-17 17:25:51, Laurent Dufour wrote: > [...] >> Thanks Michal for your feedback. >> >> I mostly focused on this database workload since this is the one where >> we hit the mmap_sem bottleneck when running on big node. On my usual >> victim node, I checked for basic usage like kernel build time, but I >> agree that's clearly not enough. >> >> I try to find details about the 'kbench' you mentioned, but I didn't get >> any valid entry. >> Would you please point me on this or any other bench tool you think will >> be useful here ? > > Sorry I meant kernbech (aka parallel kernel build). Other highly threaded > workloads doing a lot of page faults and address space modification > would be good to see as well. I wish I could give you much more > comprehensive list but I am not very good at benchmarks. > Thanks Michal, I found kernbench 0.5, I will give it a try.