Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753219AbdFMKPU (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2017 06:15:20 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:6538 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752580AbdFMKPS (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2017 06:15:18 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.39,337,1493708400"; d="scan'208";a="1181793947" Message-ID: <593FBBBC.3060603@intel.com> Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 18:17:32 +0800 From: Wei Wang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Hansen , virtio-dev@lists.oasis-open.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, mst@redhat.com, david@redhat.com, cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net, aarcange@redhat.com, amit.shah@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, liliang.opensource@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 6/6] virtio-balloon: VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_CMD_VQ References: <1497004901-30593-1-git-send-email-wei.w.wang@intel.com> <1497004901-30593-7-git-send-email-wei.w.wang@intel.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 898 Lines: 29 On 06/12/2017 10:07 PM, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 06/09/2017 03:41 AM, Wei Wang wrote: >> + for_each_populated_zone(zone) { >> + for (order = MAX_ORDER - 1; order > 0; order--) { >> + for (migratetype = 0; migratetype < MIGRATE_TYPES; >> + migratetype++) { >> + do { >> + ret = report_unused_page_block(zone, >> + order, migratetype, &page); >> + if (!ret) { >> + pfn = (u64)page_to_pfn(page); >> + add_one_chunk(vb, vq, >> + PAGE_CHNUK_UNUSED_PAGE, >> + pfn << VIRTIO_BALLOON_PFN_SHIFT, >> + (u64)(1 << order) * >> + VIRTIO_BALLOON_PAGES_PER_PAGE); >> + } >> + } while (!ret); >> + } >> + } >> + } > This is pretty unreadable. Please add some indentation. If you go > over 80 cols, then you might need to break this up into a separate > function. But, either way, it can't be left like this. OK, I'll re-arrange it. Best, Wei