Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753304AbdFMN2V (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2017 09:28:21 -0400 Received: from frisell.zx2c4.com ([192.95.5.64]:51577 "EHLO frisell.zx2c4.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752326AbdFMN2T (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2017 09:28:19 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1497342000.6068.3.camel@sipsolutions.net> References: <20170610025912.6499-1-Jason@zx2c4.com> <20170610025912.6499-7-Jason@zx2c4.com> <1497342000.6068.3.camel@sipsolutions.net> From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 15:28:15 +0200 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] mac80211/wpa: use constant time memory comparison for MACs To: Johannes Berg Cc: LKML , kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 467 Lines: 13 On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 10:20 AM, Johannes Berg wrote: > I'm not really sure that this is actually true, since you don't get > much feedback on your frame that's dropped, especially if you're > attacking from remote. Basically, I don't see how you can observe the > timing of this operation? There have been practical attacks published before that relied on jitter coming from simultaneous operations. > Anyway, applied. Great, thanks.