Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261939AbTFJTHL (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jun 2003 15:07:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261936AbTFJTGe (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jun 2003 15:06:34 -0400 Received: from e34.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.132]:40369 "EHLO e34.co.us.ibm.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261939AbTFJTE4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jun 2003 15:04:56 -0400 Subject: Is there a maintainer for serverworks.c To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.11 July 24, 2002 Message-ID: From: James Washer Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 12:18:11 -0700 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on D03NM123/03/M/IBM(Release 6.0.1 [IBM]|June 3, 2003) at 06/10/2003 13:18:15 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 533 Lines: 19 I see the 2.4.20 kernel ships with serverworks.c version 0.3, which is GPL'd, RH9.0 ships with version 0.7 ( with no mention of GPL) Does anyone know the story on this? Who authored 0.7? Is it GPL'd?? James Washer IBM Linux Change Team 877-834-8781 (Toll Free) 273-0201(Tie Line) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/