Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262165AbTFJTY1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jun 2003 15:24:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262108AbTFJTXV (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jun 2003 15:23:21 -0400 Received: from host-64-213-145-173.atlantasolutions.com ([64.213.145.173]:4289 "EHLO havoc.gtf.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261936AbTFJTW6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Jun 2003 15:22:58 -0400 Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2003 15:36:39 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik To: James Washer Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Is there a maintainer for serverworks.c Message-ID: <20030610193639.GB31962@gtf.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 585 Lines: 21 On Tue, Jun 10, 2003 at 12:18:11PM -0700, James Washer wrote: > > > > > I see the 2.4.20 kernel ships with serverworks.c version 0.3, which > is GPL'd, RH9.0 ships with version 0.7 ( with no mention of GPL) > > Does anyone know the story on this? Who authored 0.7? Is it GPL'd?? If it's not GPL'd it wouldn't be shipped... Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/