Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753825AbdFNAqb (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2017 20:46:31 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:60962 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752456AbdFNAqa (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jun 2017 20:46:30 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B7F7F23981 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=sstabellini@kernel.org Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 17:46:28 -0700 (PDT) From: Stefano Stabellini X-X-Sender: sstabellini@sstabellini-ThinkPad-X260 To: Juergen Gross cc: Stefano Stabellini , xen-devel@lists.xen.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, Stefano Stabellini Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/18] xen/pvcalls: implement socket command In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <1496431915-20774-1-git-send-email-sstabellini@kernel.org> <1496431915-20774-7-git-send-email-sstabellini@kernel.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.10 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2196 Lines: 69 On Tue, 13 Jun 2017, Juergen Gross wrote: > On 02/06/17 21:31, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > Just reply with success to the other end for now. Delay the allocation > > of the actual socket to bind and/or connect. > > > > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini > > CC: boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com > > CC: jgross@suse.com > > --- > > drivers/xen/pvcalls-back.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-back.c b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-back.c > > index 6057533..1f2bb26 100644 > > --- a/drivers/xen/pvcalls-back.c > > +++ b/drivers/xen/pvcalls-back.c > > @@ -12,12 +12,17 @@ > > * GNU General Public License for more details. > > */ > > > > +#include > > #include > > #include > > #include > > #include > > #include > > #include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > +#include > > > > #include > > #include > > @@ -54,7 +59,29 @@ struct pvcalls_fedata { > > static int pvcalls_back_socket(struct xenbus_device *dev, > > struct xen_pvcalls_request *req) > > { > > - return 0; > > + struct pvcalls_fedata *priv; > > + int ret; > > + struct xen_pvcalls_response *rsp; > > + > > + priv = dev_get_drvdata(&dev->dev); > > + > > + if (req->u.socket.domain != AF_INET || > > + req->u.socket.type != SOCK_STREAM || > > + (req->u.socket.protocol != IPPROTO_IP && > > + req->u.socket.protocol != AF_INET)) > > + ret = -EAFNOSUPPORT; > > + else > > + ret = 0; > > + > > + /* leave the actual socket allocation for later */ > > + > > + rsp = RING_GET_RESPONSE(&priv->ring, priv->ring.rsp_prod_pvt++); > > + rsp->req_id = req->req_id; > > + rsp->cmd = req->cmd; > > + rsp->u.socket.id = req->u.socket.id; > > + rsp->ret = ret; > > + > > + return ret; > > So if ret != 0 this will omit the call of > RING_PUSH_RESPONSES_AND_CHECK_NOTIFY() in pvcalls_back_work(). > > I think you want to return 0. Yes, you are right, thanks!