Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752550AbdFNQjb (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jun 2017 12:39:31 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:59326 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752042AbdFNQjN (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jun 2017 12:39:13 -0400 Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 18:39:04 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Tom Lendacky Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, Rik van Riel , Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= , Toshimitsu Kani , Arnd Bergmann , Jonathan Corbet , Matt Fleming , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Joerg Roedel , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Paolo Bonzini , Larry Woodman , Brijesh Singh , Ingo Molnar , Andy Lutomirski , "H. Peter Anvin" , Andrey Ryabinin , Alexander Potapenko , Dave Young , Thomas Gleixner , Dmitry Vyukov Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 23/34] x86, realmode: Decrypt trampoline area if memory encryption is active Message-ID: <20170614163903.fvlvscewnuk2u75x@pd.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1098 Lines: 26 On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 06:24:16PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 02:17:09PM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote: > > When Secure Memory Encryption is enabled, the trampoline area must not > > be encrypted. A CPU running in real mode will not be able to decrypt > > memory that has been encrypted because it will not be able to use addresses > > with the memory encryption mask. > > > > A recent change that added a new system_state value exposed a warning > > issued by early_ioreamp() when the system_state was not SYSTEM_BOOTING. > > At the stage where the trampoline area is decrypted, the system_state is > > now SYSTEM_SCHEDULING. The check was changed to issue a warning if the > > system_state is greater than or equal to SYSTEM_RUNNING. > > This piece along with the hunk touching system_state absolutely needs to > be a separate patch as it is unrelated. Btw, pls send this now and separate from the patchset as it is a bugfix that should go into sched/core. Thanks. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.