Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752808AbdFNWdo (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jun 2017 18:33:44 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:46503 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751600AbdFNWdn (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jun 2017 18:33:43 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.39,341,1493708400"; d="scan'208";a="980959377" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/10] x86/mm: Rework lazy TLB mode and TLB freshness tracking To: Andy Lutomirski , x86@kernel.org References: <039935bc914009103fdaa6f72f14980c19562de5.1497415951.git.luto@kernel.org> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Borislav Petkov , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Mel Gorman , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Nadav Amit , Rik van Riel , Arjan van de Ven , Peter Zijlstra , Andrew Banman , Mike Travis , Dimitri Sivanich , Juergen Gross , Boris Ostrovsky From: Dave Hansen Message-ID: Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 15:33:36 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <039935bc914009103fdaa6f72f14980c19562de5.1497415951.git.luto@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 461 Lines: 12 On 06/13/2017 09:56 PM, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > - if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &batch->cpumask)) > + if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &batch->cpumask)) { > + local_irq_disable(); > flush_tlb_func_local(&info, TLB_LOCAL_SHOOTDOWN); > + local_irq_enable(); > + } > + Could you talk a little about why this needs to be local_irq_disable() and not preempt_disable()? Is it about the case where somebody is trying to call flush_tlb_func_*() from an interrupt handler?