Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752247AbdFOJJb (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jun 2017 05:09:31 -0400 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:35700 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750858AbdFOJJa (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jun 2017 05:09:30 -0400 Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 10:09:28 +0100 From: Al Viro To: David Howells Cc: mszeredi@redhat.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, jlayton@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/27] VFS: Make get_mnt_ns() return the namespace [ver #5] Message-ID: <20170615090928.GF31671@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <149745330648.10897.9605870130502083184.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <149745334260.10897.8377331388521502715.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <149745334260.10897.8377331388521502715.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 305 Lines: 6 On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 04:15:42PM +0100, David Howells wrote: > Make get_mnt_ns() return the namespace it got a ref on for consistency with > other namespace ref getting functions. Is there any point in doing that? I mean, it's not used in your patchset anymore and existing callers are a mixed bag...