Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 1 Mar 2001 17:33:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 1 Mar 2001 17:33:32 -0500 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:26128 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 1 Mar 2001 17:33:24 -0500 Subject: Re: [patch][rfc][rft] vm throughput 2.4.2-ac4 To: riel@conectiva.com.br (Rik van Riel) Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 22:36:29 +0000 (GMT) Cc: mikeg@wen-online.de (Mike Galbraith), marcelo@conectiva.com.br (Marcelo Tosatti), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (linux-kernel), alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox) In-Reply-To: from "Rik van Riel" at Mar 01, 2001 06:05:29 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Except that your code throws the random junk at the elevator all > the time, while my code only bothers the elevator every once in > a while. This should make it possible for the disk reads to > continue with less interruptions. Think about it this way, throwing the stuff at the I/O layer is saying 'please make this go away'. Thats the VM decision. Scheduling the I/O is an I/O and driver layer decision. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/