Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752498AbdFOOYk (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jun 2017 10:24:40 -0400 Received: from mail-lf0-f65.google.com ([209.85.215.65]:34898 "EHLO mail-lf0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752441AbdFOOYi (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Jun 2017 10:24:38 -0400 Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2017 16:24:30 +0200 From: Dawid Kurek To: Jani Nikula Cc: Daniel Vetter , Sean Paul , David Airlie , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: Reduce scope of 'state' variable Message-ID: <20170615142430.GA13398@gmail.com> References: <20170615104142.GA29276@gmail.com> <871sqlzewc.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <871sqlzewc.fsf@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 170615-0, 15/06/2017), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1487 Lines: 50 On 15/06/17, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Thu, 15 Jun 2017, Dawid Kurek wrote: > > Smaller scope reduces visibility of variable and makes usage of > > uninitialized variable less possible. > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c | 5 +++-- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c > > index f32506a..ea5a9a7 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c > > @@ -108,10 +108,11 @@ struct drm_atomic_state * > > drm_atomic_state_alloc(struct drm_device *dev) > > { > > struct drm_mode_config *config = &dev->mode_config; > > - struct drm_atomic_state *state; > > > > if (!config->funcs->atomic_state_alloc) { > > - state = kzalloc(sizeof(*state), GFP_KERNEL); > > + struct drm_atomic_state *state > > + = kzalloc(sizeof(*state), GFP_KERNEL); > > Separate declaration and initialization would lead to a cleaner patch > and result. I saw combining declaration and initialization is quite common, i.e. in drm_atomic file. Personally, I also prefer those in one statement. But yes, it looks cleaner here, in two lines. v2 sent :) Thanks, Dawid > > BR, > Jani. > > > + > > if (!state) > > return NULL; > > if (drm_atomic_state_init(dev, state) < 0) { > > -- > Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus