Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 1 Mar 2001 17:39:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 1 Mar 2001 17:39:14 -0500 Received: from brutus.conectiva.com.br ([200.250.58.146]:20468 "EHLO brutus.conectiva.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 1 Mar 2001 17:39:06 -0500 Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2001 19:38:35 -0300 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Chris Evans cc: Mike Galbraith , Marcelo Tosatti , linux-kernel , Alan Cox Subject: Re: [patch][rfc][rft] vm throughput 2.4.2-ac4 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, Chris Evans wrote: > On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, Rik van Riel wrote: > > > True. I think we want something in-between our ideas... > ^^^^^^^ > > a while. This should make it possible for the disk reads to > ^^^^^^ > > Oh dear.. not more "vm design by waving hands in the air". Come > on people, improve the vm by careful profiling, tweaking and > benching, not by throwing random patches in that seem cool in > theory. Actually, this was more of "vm design by looking at what the FreeBSD folks did, why it didn't work and how they fixed it after 2 years of testing various things". Rik -- Linux MM bugzilla: http://linux-mm.org/bugzilla.shtml Virtual memory is like a game you can't win; However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose... http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/