Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261985AbTFKObF (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jun 2003 10:31:05 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262015AbTFKObF (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jun 2003 10:31:05 -0400 Received: from mail1.ewetel.de ([212.6.122.16]:33972 "EHLO mail1.ewetel.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261985AbTFKObD (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jun 2003 10:31:03 -0400 Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 16:44:37 +0200 (CEST) From: Pascal Schmidt To: Larry McVoy cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [BK-CVS gateway] version tags Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-CheckCompat: OK Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 672 Lines: 21 Hi! I noticed both the 2.4 and 2.5 BK->CVS trees don't have version tags any more (v2_5_70, for example, as in the old tree). Is this intentional? Did CVS take too long to tag all files or something? It was quite a nice feature to have them, very useful for finding out the differences between certain kernel versions. I can live without it, though. It's still a nice service without the tags. (Thanks!) -- Ciao, Pascal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/