Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754018AbdFPOK0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jun 2017 10:10:26 -0400 Received: from ale.deltatee.com ([207.54.116.67]:33170 "EHLO ale.deltatee.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753101AbdFPOKY (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jun 2017 10:10:24 -0400 To: Allen Hubbe , linux-ntb@googlegroups.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20170615203729.9009-1-logang@deltatee.com> <000001d2e6a7$dfc719a0$9f554ce0$@dell.com> Cc: "'Jon Mason'" , "'Dave Jiang'" , "'Bjorn Helgaas'" , "'Greg Kroah-Hartman'" , "'Kurt Schwemmer'" , "'Stephen Bates'" , "'Serge Semin'" , Sergey.Semin@t-platforms.ru From: Logan Gunthorpe Message-ID: Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 08:09:55 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <000001d2e6a7$dfc719a0$9f554ce0$@dell.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.147.191.165 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: Sergey.Semin@t-platforms.ru, fancer.lancer@gmail.com, sbates@raithlin.com, kurt.schwemmer@microsemi.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, bhelgaas@google.com, dave.jiang@intel.com, jdmason@kudzu.us, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-ntb@googlegroups.com, Allen.Hubbe@dell.com X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: logang@deltatee.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/13] Switchtec NTB Support X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on ale.deltatee.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 809 Lines: 15 On 16/06/17 07:53 AM, Allen Hubbe wrote: > See what is staged in https://github.com/jonmason/ntb.git ntb-next, with the addition of multi-peer support by Serge. It would be good at this stage to understand whether the api changes there would also support the Switchtec driver, and what if anything must change, or be planned to change, to support the Switchtec driver. Ah, yes I had seen that patchset some time ago but I wasn't aware of it's status or that it was queued up in ntb-next. I think it will be no problem to reconcile with the switchtec driver and I'll rebase onto ntb-next for the next posting of the patch set. However, I *may* save full multi-host switchtec support for a follow up submission. My initial impression is the new API will support the switchtec hardware well. Thanks, Logan