Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752661AbdFPOx6 (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jun 2017 10:53:58 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:60596 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752321AbdFPOxz (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jun 2017 10:53:55 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com ADB4680489 Authentication-Results: ext-mx04.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx04.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dhowells@redhat.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com ADB4680489 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20170616090621.GA13775@infradead.org> References: <20170616090621.GA13775@infradead.org> <149745330648.10897.9605870130502083184.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <149745338248.10897.17175227466711674034.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <20170615093927.GG31671@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Al Viro , mszeredi@redhat.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, jlayton@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/27] VFS: Differentiate mount flags (MS_*) from internal superblock flags [ver #5] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <9140.1497624810.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 15:53:30 +0100 Message-ID: <9141.1497624810@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.28]); Fri, 16 Jun 2017 14:53:54 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 197 Lines: 7 Christoph Hellwig wrote: > It might be good to just introduce the internal flags field first, Internal flags field? Did you mean Al's suggested sb_readonly() wrapper? David