Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752042AbdFPQVj (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jun 2017 12:21:39 -0400 Received: from lelnx194.ext.ti.com ([198.47.27.80]:9848 "EHLO lelnx194.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750787AbdFPQVg (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jun 2017 12:21:36 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] remoteproc: imx_rproc: add a NXP/Freescale imx rproc driver From: Suman Anna To: Oleksij Rempel , , , , , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Russell King , Shawn Guo , Fabio Estevam , Ohad Ben-Cohen , Bjorn Andersson , CC: Oleksij Rempel References: <20170614204855.18347-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de> <20170614204855.18347-3-o.rempel@pengutronix.de> <96edc898-ad2b-c781-b7eb-0645902837df@ti.com> Message-ID: Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2017 11:20:45 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <96edc898-ad2b-c781-b7eb-0645902837df@ti.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [128.247.58.153] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 11301 Lines: 368 On 06/15/2017 02:01 PM, Suman Anna wrote: > Hi Oleksij, > > On 06/14/2017 03:48 PM, Oleksij Rempel wrote: >> From: Oleksij Rempel >> >> this driver was tested on NXP imx7d but should work on >> imx6sx as well. >> It will upload firmware to OCRAM, which shared memory between >> Cortex A7 and Cortex M4, then turn M4 on. > > Mostly looks fine, need to address few comments. I take it that you > haven't added the binding since this is just an RFC. > >> >> Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel >> --- >> drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig | 8 ++ >> drivers/remoteproc/Makefile | 1 + >> drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 264 >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 3 files changed, 273 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c >> >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig >> index faad69a1a597..8d33bff4f530 100644 >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Kconfig >> @@ -130,6 +130,14 @@ config ST_SLIM_REMOTEPROC >> tristate >> depends on REMOTEPROC >> +config IMX_REMOTEPROC >> + tristate "IMX6/7 remoteproc support" >> + depends on SOC_IMX6SX || SOC_IMX7D >> + depends on REMOTEPROC >> + help >> + TODO, write some thing here >> + This can be either built-in or a loadable module. >> + >> endif # REMOTEPROC >> endmenu >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile >> index ffc5e430df27..d351c25cdb4e 100644 >> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/Makefile >> @@ -19,3 +19,4 @@ qcom_wcnss_pil-y += qcom_wcnss.o >> qcom_wcnss_pil-y += qcom_wcnss_iris.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_ST_REMOTEPROC) += st_remoteproc.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_ST_SLIM_REMOTEPROC) += st_slim_rproc.o >> +obj-$(CONFIG_IMX_REMOTEPROC) += imx_rproc.o >> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c >> b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c >> new file mode 100644 >> index 000000000000..6bef85237a27 >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c >> @@ -0,0 +1,264 @@ >> +/* >> + * Oleksij Rempel > > Please add a blank line here. > >> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or >> + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License >> + * version 2 as published by the Free Software Foundation. >> + * >> + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, >> + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of >> + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the >> + * GNU General Public License for more details. >> + */ >> + >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> +#include >> + >> +#define IMX7D_ENABLE_M4 BIT(3) >> +#define IMX7D_SW_M4P_RST BIT(2) >> +#define IMX7D_SW_M4C_RST BIT(1) >> +#define IMX7D_SW_M4C_NON_SCLR_RST BIT(0) >> + >> +#define IMX7D_M4_RST_MASK 0xf >> + >> + >> +#define IMX7D_RPROC_MEM_MAX 2 >> +enum { >> + IMX7D_RPROC_IMEM, >> + IMX7D_RPROC_DMEM, >> +}; >> + >> +static const char *mem_names[IMX7D_RPROC_MEM_MAX] = { >> + [IMX7D_RPROC_IMEM] = "imem", >> + [IMX7D_RPROC_DMEM] = "dmem", >> +}; > > Do you really need these to be globally defined? You only need them in > the addr_init function, they can be made local to that function. > >> + >> +/** >> + * struct imx_rproc_mem - slim internal memory structure >> + * @cpu_addr: MPU virtual address of the memory region >> + * @bus_addr: Bus address used to access the memory region >> + * @size: Size of the memory region >> + */ >> +struct imx_rproc_mem { >> + void __iomem *cpu_addr; >> + phys_addr_t bus_addr; > > Are the rproc-view of these regions same as the bus addresses or > do they have their own local addresses? If latter, images that are built > for those will be using those addresses in which case you need some > offset calculation in the da_to_va ops? > >> + size_t size; >> +}; >> + >> +struct imx_rproc_dcfg { >> + int offset; >> +}; >> + >> +struct imx_rproc { >> + struct device *dev; >> + struct regmap *regmap; >> + struct rproc *rproc; >> + const struct imx_rproc_dcfg *dcfg; > > No need of aligning the variables, you can get rid of the additional > whitespaces and maintain consistent style. > >> + struct imx_rproc_mem mem[IMX7D_RPROC_MEM_MAX]; >> + struct clk *clk; >> +}; >> + >> +static const struct imx_rproc_dcfg imx_rproc_cfg_imx7d = { >> + .offset = 0xc, >> +}; >> + >> +static int imx_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc) >> +{ >> + struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv; >> + const struct imx_rproc_dcfg *dcfg = priv->dcfg; >> + struct device *dev = priv->dev; >> + int ret; >> + >> + ret = clk_enable(priv->clk); >> + if (ret) { >> + dev_err(&rproc->dev, "Failed to enable clock\n"); >> + return ret; >> + } >> + >> + ret = regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, dcfg->offset, >> + IMX7D_M4_RST_MASK, >> + IMX7D_SW_M4C_RST | IMX7D_SW_M4P_RST | IMX7D_ENABLE_M4); >> + if (ret) { >> + dev_err(dev, "Filed to enable M4!\n"); typo for failed.. >> + clk_disable(priv->clk); >> + } >> + >> + return ret; >> +} >> + >> +static int imx_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc) >> +{ >> + struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv; >> + const struct imx_rproc_dcfg *dcfg = priv->dcfg; >> + struct device *dev = priv->dev; >> + int ret; >> + >> + ret = regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, dcfg->offset, >> + IMX7D_M4_RST_MASK, >> + IMX7D_SW_M4C_NON_SCLR_RST); >> + if (ret) >> + dev_err(dev, "Filed to stop M4!\n"); >> + >> + clk_disable(priv->clk); >> + >> + return ret; >> +} >> + >> +static void *imx_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, u64 da, int len) >> +{ >> + struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv; >> + void *va = NULL; >> + int i; >> + >> + for (i = 0; i < IMX7D_RPROC_MEM_MAX; i++) { >> + if (da != priv->mem[i].bus_addr) >> + continue; >> + >> + if (len <= priv->mem[i].size) { >> + /* __force to make sparse happy with type conversion */ >> + va = (__force void *)priv->mem[i].cpu_addr; >> + break; >> + } missed this yesterday, but this implementation is wrong, you need to be doing a range check and translate here accordingly. See for an example a patch on a driver I submitted recently, https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9773687/ regards Suman >> + } >> + >> + dev_dbg(&rproc->dev, "da = 0x%llx len = 0x%x va = 0x%p\n", da, >> len, va); >> + >> + return va; >> +} >> + >> +static const struct rproc_ops imx_rproc_ops = { >> + .start = imx_rproc_start, >> + .stop = imx_rproc_stop, >> + .da_to_va = imx_rproc_da_to_va, >> +}; >> + >> +static const struct of_device_id imx_rproc_of_match[] = { >> + { .compatible = "fsl,imx7d-rproc", .data = &imx_rproc_cfg_imx7d }, >> + {}, >> +}; >> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, imx_rproc_of_match); >> + >> +static int imx_rproc_addr_init(struct imx_rproc *priv, >> + struct platform_device *pdev) >> +{ >> + int i, err; >> + struct resource *res; >> + >> + /* get imem and dmem */ >> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(mem_names); i++) { >> + res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, >> + mem_names[i]); >> + if (!res) >> + continue; >> + >> + priv->mem[i].cpu_addr = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res); >> + if (IS_ERR(priv->mem[i].cpu_addr)) { >> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "devm_ioremap_resource failed\n"); >> + err = PTR_ERR(priv->mem[i].cpu_addr); >> + return err; >> + } >> + priv->mem[i].bus_addr = res->start & 0xffff; >> + priv->mem[i].size = resource_size(res); >> + } >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static int imx_rproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> +{ >> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; >> + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node; >> + struct imx_rproc *priv; >> + struct rproc *rproc; >> + struct regmap_config config = { .name = "imx_rproc" }; >> + const struct imx_rproc_dcfg *dcfg; >> + struct regmap *regmap; >> + int ret; >> + >> + regmap = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(np, "syscon"); >> + if (IS_ERR(regmap)) { >> + dev_err(dev, "failed to find syscon\n"); >> + return PTR_ERR(regmap); >> + } >> + regmap_attach_dev(dev, regmap, &config); >> + >> + /* set some other name then imx */ >> + rproc = rproc_alloc(dev, "imx_rproc", &imx_rproc_ops, NULL, >> sizeof(*priv)); >> + if (!rproc) { >> + ret = -ENOMEM; >> + goto err; >> + } >> + >> + dcfg = of_device_get_match_data(dev); >> + if (!dcfg) >> + return -EINVAL; > > move this up to the beginning of the function. You can avoid the cleanup > (you are missing an rproc_free() here) > >> + >> + priv = rproc->priv; >> + priv->rproc = rproc; >> + priv->regmap = regmap; >> + priv->dcfg = dcfg; >> + >> + dev_set_drvdata(dev, rproc); >> + >> + ret = imx_rproc_addr_init(priv, pdev); >> + if (ret) { >> + dev_err(dev, "filed on imx_rproc_addr_init\n"); >> + goto err_put_rproc; >> + } >> + >> + priv->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL); >> + if (IS_ERR(priv->clk)) { >> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to get clock\n"); >> + return PTR_ERR(priv->clk); >> + } >> + >> + ret = rproc_add(rproc); >> + if (ret) { >> + dev_err(dev, "rproc_add failed\n"); >> + goto err_put_rproc; >> + } >> + >> + ret = clk_prepare(priv->clk); >> + if (ret) >> + dev_err(dev, "failed to get clock\n"); > > How are your internal memories clocked? If they need the same clock, > rproc_add() would need the clock to be enabled for loading section data > into those regions as part of rproc_boot(), and your current enable in > imx_rproc_start() will be too late. Also, do not see a balancing > clk_unprepare() call in remove, and a missing rproc_del() on failure here. > > regards > Suman > >> + >> + return ret; >> + >> +err_put_rproc: >> + rproc_free(rproc); >> +err: >> + return ret; >> +} >> + >> +static int imx_rproc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) >> +{ >> + struct rproc *rproc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); >> + >> + rproc_del(rproc); >> + rproc_free(rproc); >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static struct platform_driver imx_rproc_driver = { >> + .probe = imx_rproc_probe, >> + .remove = imx_rproc_remove, >> + .driver = { >> + .name = "imx_rproc", >> + .of_match_table = imx_rproc_of_match, >> + }, >> +}; >> + >> +module_platform_driver(imx_rproc_driver); >> + >> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2"); >> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("IMX6/7 remote processor control driver"); >> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Oleksij Rempel "); >> >