Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 1 Mar 2001 19:03:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 1 Mar 2001 19:03:33 -0500 Received: from idiom.com ([216.240.32.1]:60685 "EHLO idiom.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 1 Mar 2001 19:03:25 -0500 Message-ID: <3A9EDB8A.9999295E@namesys.com> Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2001 02:30:18 +0300 From: Hans Reiser Organization: Namesys X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.74 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.14 i686) X-Accept-Language: en, ru MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tigran Aivazian , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: What is 2.4 Linux networking performance like compared to BSD? In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Tigran Aivazian wrote: > > On Thu, 1 Mar 2001, Hans Reiser wrote: > > > > This is indeed what we should do if we get no answer from the list by someone > > who has already done such work. > > > > Hans, > > exactly what you want to measure? I have UP, 2way-SMP and 4way-SMP > machines all of which have at least Linux+FreeBSD installed. All my tests > so far (e.g. comparing NFS servers or filesystems etc) showed Linux (2.4) > to be a lot faster than FreeBSD in all areas. However, to get specific > answers you need to ask specific questions. Ask and you shall receive. > > (things like SPEC SFS results I can't tell because it is illegal (without > going through proper steps of publishing them), I shouldn't even be saying > that they show Linux to be much faster :) > > Regards, > Tigran Thanks Tigan, you helped me move the client past the Linux vs. BSD issue. Hans - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/