DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 7025CC0587CE
Date: Sat, 17 Jun 2017 10:04:02 +0200
From: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-perf-users <linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
        David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
        Yao Jin <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: perf report: fix off-by-one for non-activation frames
Message-ID: <20170617080402.GA1402@host1.jankratochvil.net>
References: <20170515150444.6841-1-milian.wolff@kdab.com>
 <5576772.scvU8aRrkq@agathebauer>
 <20170616115744.GA14948@host1.jankratochvil.net>
 <31894796.cyPb9Arfxd@agathebauer>
 <CAM9d7cjqZpuxPmARtp_Zy_PhZ+Gpt7Px_ecsLe=dhguNsYW1Bw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAM9d7cjqZpuxPmARtp_Zy_PhZ+Gpt7Px_ecsLe=dhguNsYW1Bw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 464
Lines: 12

On Sat, 17 Jun 2017 09:56:57 +0200, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Not sure whether it needs be fixed or not.  If we fix it, srcline and
> address would not match so it can give its own confusion to users.
> Ideally it should display an addressof the instruction before the
> address IMHO.

One can figure million ways how it can behave and each one has its pros and
cons.  I was just describing the current behavior of GDB and LLDB which people
are used to already.


Jan