Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264476AbTFKVQm (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jun 2003 17:16:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264507AbTFKVQQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jun 2003 17:16:16 -0400 Received: from 66-122-194-202.ded.pacbell.net ([66.122.194.202]:7089 "HELO mail.keyresearch.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S264490AbTFKVPC (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jun 2003 17:15:02 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] New x86_64 time code for 2.5.70 From: "Bryan O'Sullivan" To: Mika =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Penttil=E4?= Cc: ak@suse.de, vojtech@suse.cz, discuss@x86-64.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <3EE79FD1.8060503@kolumbus.fi> References: <1055357432.17154.77.camel@serpentine.internal.keyresearch.com> <3EE79FD1.8060503@kolumbus.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Message-Id: <1055366925.17154.95.camel@serpentine.internal.keyresearch.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.0 Date: 11 Jun 2003 14:28:45 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 518 Lines: 15 On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 14:32, Mika Penttilä wrote: > Line below seems to be wrong, given hpet period is in fsecs. I don't believe the HPET code got much testing in 2.4, and my boxes don't have ACPI table entries for the HPET, so it's troublesome to test it on them.