Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754044AbdFSMwJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jun 2017 08:52:09 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f49.google.com ([209.85.218.49]:33624 "EHLO mail-oi0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753891AbdFSMwI (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jun 2017 08:52:08 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20170609125730.25502-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de> <20170609125730.25502-2-o.rempel@pengutronix.de> <8e50ff3d-d1f0-2795-5dc9-302979ca9694@i2se.com> <20170619060629.du3qmihhkkyym44h@pengutronix.de> From: Fabio Estevam Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 09:52:06 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] nvmem: dt: document SNVS LPGPR binding To: Stefan Wahren Cc: Oleksij Rempel , Fabio Estevam , Mark Rutland , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , linux-kernel , Oleksij Rempel , Rob Herring , Srinivas Kandagatla , Sascha Hauer , Maxime Ripard , Shawn Guo , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 227 Lines: 7 Hi Stefan, On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 7:58 AM, Stefan Wahren wrote: > do you know how the clock "lp_ipg_clk_s" should be handled? As per the Reference Manual there is no CCM gating bits for this clock.