Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752854AbdFSQFI (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Mon, 19 Jun 2017 12:05:08 -0400
Received: from mail-qt0-f178.google.com ([209.85.216.178]:33381 "EHLO
        mail-qt0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1752133AbdFSQFE (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 19 Jun 2017 12:05:04 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20170619155858.xjs5nvdkg42b73vg@ninjato>
References: <cover.1497025304.git.lolivei@synopsys.com> <bef9f237bed23f0ea05499b085103f7eea9058a1.1497025304.git.lolivei@synopsys.com>
 <CAHp75VeHoUrq-PfayNZYGP0f-bbnKQQEN4uMBg6ZASJs46b_PQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <6e332d71-1891-21aa-4479-b91a7550f8af@synopsys.com> <20170619155858.xjs5nvdkg42b73vg@ninjato>
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 19:05:03 +0300
Message-ID: <CAHp75VfpgOZ72=5F3aN_tfau3TnyGLsdKt=sdx_ZJ04wtxMtJg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 5/6] i2c: designware: add SLAVE mode functions
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc: Luis Oliveira <Luis.Oliveira@synopsys.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
        linux-i2c <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Ramiro Oliveira <Ramiro.Oliveira@synopsys.com>,
        Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com>, CARLOS.PALMINHA@synopsys.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 879
Lines: 22

On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 6:58 PM, Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> wrote:
>> Believe me I've looked for mistakes like this but I've read the code so many
>> times I don't think I can see the obvious anymore.
>
> Yes, I know this. And you worked hard on this slave feature,
> acknowledged.
>
> Patches 1-4 look good to me from what I glimpsed. I largely trust here
> the *much* appreciated review from Jarkko and Andy. Thanks a lot, guys!
>
> I wonder if we haven't reached a state where Luis just could fix the
> buildbot error (missing 'select I2C_SLAVE') and the thing pointed out by
> Andy and we handle further small fixes incrementally during the v4.13
> cycle? AFAICS there is no major show-stopper, or am I wrong?

I would go with the following plan:
1. Push 1-4
2. Resend 5-6 with addressed pointed issues for one more (fast) round

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko