Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751969AbdFTDGW (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jun 2017 23:06:22 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-f51.google.com ([209.85.214.51]:35047 "EHLO mail-it0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750960AbdFTDGT (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jun 2017 23:06:19 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170619184245.GA20187@graymalkin.kudzu.us> References: <20170619184245.GA20187@graymalkin.kudzu.us> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 11:06:17 +0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: W-l7Hu0WX4-wFVFNBuXJGPM_9u0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] NTB bug fixes for v4.12 To: Jon Mason Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-ntb@googlegroups.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 655 Lines: 16 On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 2:42 AM, Jon Mason wrote: > Hello Linus, > Here are a few NTB bug fixes for 4.12. So I pulled this, mainly because it removed more lines than it added due to the revert. But generally I absolutely *hate* pulling stuff that I can see was committed just hours ago. Why was that branch so recent? It very obviously cannot have been in any linux-next or 0day or gotten any other exposure. Is there a reason for that behavior? And if there is, just include it in the "please pull", because if it wasn't for the "removes more lines than adds" I probably would just have decided to ignore this. Linus