Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264728AbTFLEBp (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jun 2003 00:01:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264731AbTFLEBp (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jun 2003 00:01:45 -0400 Received: from astound-64-85-224-253.ca.astound.net ([64.85.224.253]:38411 "EHLO master.linux-ide.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264728AbTFLEBn (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jun 2003 00:01:43 -0400 Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 21:02:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Andre Hedrick To: Alan Cox cc: James Washer , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Is there a maintainer for serverworks.c In-Reply-To: <1055281381.32662.42.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1088 Lines: 38 I authored the mess. The GPL extra names are because back in the Andrew Balsa days of the 2.0.33,4,5-Jumbo patch series Aubry, Andrzey, et al, we all worked togather. Only Sun (osb4,csb5a) and I (osb4,csb5,csb6,csb6a) are the true authors. I am just lazy and do not delete people's names. What is wrong with it all now? Andre Hedrick LAD Storage Consulting Group On 10 Jun 2003, Alan Cox wrote: > On Maw, 2003-06-10 at 20:18, James Washer wrote: > > > > > > I see the 2.4.20 kernel ships with serverworks.c version 0.3, which > > is GPL'd, RH9.0 ships with version 0.7 ( with no mention of GPL) > > > > Does anyone know the story on this? Who authored 0.7? Is it GPL'd?? > > 0.7 is based on 0.3. Its by Michel Aubry, Andrzey, Sun and Red Hat. Not > sure where the usual 4 line GPL blurb went. 2.4.21rc has 0.8 btw. > > Alan > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/