Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752937AbdFTJSP (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jun 2017 05:18:15 -0400 Received: from mail-pf0-f193.google.com ([209.85.192.193]:34514 "EHLO mail-pf0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752188AbdFTJPp (ORCPT ); Tue, 20 Jun 2017 05:15:45 -0400 From: guangrong.xiao@gmail.com X-Google-Original-From: xiaoguangrong@tencent.com To: pbonzini@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com, avi.kivity@gmail.com, rkrcmar@redhat.com Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Xiao Guangrong Subject: [PATCH v2 1/7] KVM: MMU: correct the behavior of mmu_spte_update_no_track Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 17:15:20 +0800 Message-Id: <20170620091526.4287-2-xiaoguangrong@tencent.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.9.4 In-Reply-To: <20170620091526.4287-1-xiaoguangrong@tencent.com> References: <20170620091526.4287-1-xiaoguangrong@tencent.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1987 Lines: 65 From: Xiao Guangrong Current behavior of mmu_spte_update_no_track() does not match the name of _no_track() as actually the A/D bits are tracked and returned to the caller This patch introduces the real _no_track() function to update the spte regardless of A/D bits and rename the original function to _track() The _no_track() function will be used by later patches to update upper spte which need not care of A/D bits indeed Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong --- arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c index 5d3376f..d18c17c 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c @@ -583,10 +583,29 @@ static void mmu_spte_set(u64 *sptep, u64 new_spte) } /* - * Update the SPTE (excluding the PFN), but do not track changes in its + * Update the SPTE (excluding the PFN) regardless of accessed/dirty + * status which is used to update the upper level spte. + */ +static void mmu_spte_update_no_track(u64 *sptep, u64 new_spte) +{ + u64 old_spte = *sptep; + + WARN_ON(!is_shadow_present_pte(new_spte)); + + if (!is_shadow_present_pte(old_spte)) { + mmu_spte_set(sptep, new_spte); + return; + } + + __update_clear_spte_fast(sptep, new_spte); +} + +/* + * Update the SPTE (excluding the PFN), the original value is + * returned, based on it, the caller can track changes of its * accessed/dirty status. */ -static u64 mmu_spte_update_no_track(u64 *sptep, u64 new_spte) +static u64 mmu_spte_update_track(u64 *sptep, u64 new_spte) { u64 old_spte = *sptep; @@ -621,7 +640,7 @@ static u64 mmu_spte_update_no_track(u64 *sptep, u64 new_spte) static bool mmu_spte_update(u64 *sptep, u64 new_spte) { bool flush = false; - u64 old_spte = mmu_spte_update_no_track(sptep, new_spte); + u64 old_spte = mmu_spte_update_track(sptep, new_spte); if (!is_shadow_present_pte(old_spte)) return false; -- 2.9.4