Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 2 Nov 2000 03:12:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 2 Nov 2000 03:12:26 -0500 Received: from shimura.Math.Berkeley.EDU ([169.229.58.53]:3076 "EHLO shimura.math.berkeley.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 2 Nov 2000 03:12:07 -0500 Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2000 00:12:27 -0800 (PST) From: Wayne Whitney Reply-To: whitney@math.berkeley.edu To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [BUG?] two swapping processes freeze 2.4.0-test10 (but not 2.2.18pre19) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Wayne Whitney wrote: > On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Rik van Riel wrote (in "Re: [BUG] /proc//stat > access stalls badly for swapping process, 2.4.0-test10"): > > > 3) combine this with the elevator starvation stuff (ask Jens > > Axboe for blk-7 to alleviate this issue) and you have a > > scenario where processes using /proc//stat have the > > possibility to block on multiple processes that are in the > > process of handling a page fault (but are being starved) I just tried patching 2.4.0-test10 with Jens Axboe's blk-7 patch for 2.4.0-test10-pre6. It applies cleanly other than "Hunk #1 succeeded at 855 (offset -20 lines)" on file mm/filemap.c. Unfortunately, this had no effect on the behavior I described . . . Best wishes, Wayne - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/