Message-ID: <1055413235.3ee853f3437fc@support.tuxbox.dk>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 12:20:35 +0200
From: Martin List-Petersen <martin@list-petersen.dk>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: SCO's claims seem empty
References: <1054512915.1620.2.camel@localhost>  <200306020119.h521Jbdv003050@eeyore.valparaiso.cl>  <20030602111037.GA32253@pusa.informat.uv.es> <3EDB33F8.9060507@stesmi.com>  <1054902687.3ee0899f6f6f7@support.tuxbox.dk> <1054912403.17190.1.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <1054912403.17190.1.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.2-cvs
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1135
Lines: 31

Citat Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>:

> On Gwe, 2003-06-06 at 13:31, Martin List-Petersen wrote
> > Besides this article states confirmation on similar code, still i would
> say: Did
> > it come from Linux orginally or did it come from SCO ?
> > 
> > http://informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=10300314
> 
> If it isn't simply carefully doctored choices designed mislead clueless
> analysts. You are also ignoring at least two other things - code that is
> common because its from the reference (eg intel locking code) and code
> from third party vendors legitimately supplied to both Linux and SCO.

This article states, that they might violate the GPL:

http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,3959,1123199,00.asp

Regards,
Martin List-Petersen
martin at list-petersen dot dk
--
Q:	What do you call the scratches that you get when a female
	sheep bites you?
A:	Ewe nicks.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/