Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264849AbTFLPa1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jun 2003 11:30:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264861AbTFLPa1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jun 2003 11:30:27 -0400 Received: from mail.skjellin.no ([80.239.42.67]:32996 "HELO mail.skjellin.no") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S264849AbTFLPa0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jun 2003 11:30:26 -0400 Subject: Re: [QUESTION] What about EtherLeak report from @stake From: Andre Tomt To: Martin Zwickel Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20030612172426.0a3a60d9.martin.zwickel@technotrend.de> References: <20030612172426.0a3a60d9.martin.zwickel@technotrend.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Organization: Message-Id: <1055432648.976.136.camel@slurv.ws.tomt.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4- Date: 12 Jun 2003 17:44:08 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 756 Lines: 27 On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 17:24, Martin Zwickel wrote: > Hi there! > > What do you think about this: > > http://www.atstake.com/research/advisories/2003/atstake_etherleak_report.pdf > http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/412115 > > Are those padding bug's fixed in >=2.5.x/2.4.21? > > Or isn't it that critical? It was fixed in 2.4.x early 2.4.21-pre, and in 2.2.2x sometime I dont really recall. It's also fixed in 2.5.x, according to linux.bkbits.net. Most vendor kernels are fixed, too. -- Cheers, Andr? Tomt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/