Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753761AbdFVTnK (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jun 2017 15:43:10 -0400 Received: from atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz ([195.113.26.193]:52916 "EHLO atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750847AbdFVTnJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jun 2017 15:43:09 -0400 Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 21:43:06 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Patchwork , sakari.ailus@iki.fi, laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, mchehab@kernel.org, pali.rohar@gmail.com, sre@kernel.org, kernel list , linux-arm-kernel , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, tony@atomide.com, khilman@kernel.org, aaro.koskinen@iki.fi, ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com, patrikbachan@gmail.com, serge@hallyn.com, abcloriens@gmail.com Subject: Re: patchwork: on whose behalf is it working? was Re: [linux-media] Patch notification: 3 patches updated Message-ID: <20170622194306.GA25853@amd> References: <20170622150601.4956.51414@www.linuxtv.org> <20170622151903.GA14761@amd> <20170622123504.0015c78b@vento.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170622123504.0015c78b@vento.lan> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1755 Lines: 62 --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi! > > > The following patches (submitted by you) have been updated in patchwo= rk: > > >=20 > > > * linux-media: [RFC,07/13] v4l2: device_register_subdev_nodes: allow= calling multiple times > > > - http://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/39403/ > > > - for: Linux Media kernel patches > > > was: New > > > now: Accepted =20 > >=20 > > Dear patchwork, I'm not sure on who's behalf you are mailing me. (And > > that would be really nice to fix.) >=20 > Sorry, but patchwork is not smart enough to read and reply=20 > e-mails yet :-) It is just a dumb robot. Well, fortunately he's got human helpers :-). > > If you are writing on Sakari's behalf, all is well. >=20 > > If you are writing on someone else's behalf, you may tell that > > someone to coordinate with Sakari, because he likely has it in his > > tree already. >=20 > From the delatate to: field, it seems that Sakari was the one > that did the change... Aha, thanks for the pointer. > However, patchwork is also dumb enough to not store any info > about who changed a status (or even to log it)... Hopefully, patchwork will get smarter one day... Thanks, Pavel --=20 (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blo= g.html --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAllMHcoACgkQMOfwapXb+vI+EgCcD2PcsQ85bWaQClOD5+9aGLCs fmYAnjdVZsRPmnJpsfCtSJG8sFu5RhMr =R1kA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6--