Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754061AbdFVX6s (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jun 2017 19:58:48 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([65.50.211.133]:34667 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754010AbdFVX6q (ORCPT ); Thu, 22 Jun 2017 19:58:46 -0400 Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 16:58:43 -0700 From: Darren Hart To: =?utf-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBLxJlwaWXFhA==?= Cc: Jonathan Woithe , Andy Shevchenko , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] platform/x86: fujitsu-laptop: do not update ACPI device power status Message-ID: <20170622235843.GC27213@fury> References: <20170616044058.30443-1-kernel@kempniu.pl> <20170616044058.30443-6-kernel@kempniu.pl> <20170621201727.GC25900@fury> <20170622210235.GC4194@kmp-mobile.hq.kempniu.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20170622210235.GC4194@kmp-mobile.hq.kempniu.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1394 Lines: 28 On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 11:02:35PM +0200, Michał Kępień wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 06:40:56AM +0200, Michał Kępień wrote: > > > Calling acpi_bus_update_power() for ACPI devices FUJ02B1 and FUJ02E3 is > > > pointless as they are not power manageable (neither _PS0 nor _PR0 is > > > defined for any of them), which causes their power state to be inherited > > > from their parent devices. Given the ACPI paths of these two devices > > > (\_SB.PCI0.LPCB.FJEX, \_SB.FEXT), their parent devices are also not > > > power manageable. These parent devices will thus have their power state > > > initialized to ACPI_STATE_D0, which in turn causes the power state for > > > both FUJ02B1 and FUJ02E3 to always be ACPI_STATE_D0 ("on"). > > > > > > > How confident are we that all implementations of these two ACPI devices lack > > _PS0 and _PR0 ? > > I looked at DSDT dumps of four different Fujitsu laptops released in the > past ten years or so for which at least one of these two ACPI devices is > present and found no traces of either of these methods being defined for > them. I do not think we have a way of ensuring that the above holds > true for every other model out there, but I will point out that > fujitsu-laptop is the only user of acpi_bus_update_power() outside of > drivers/acpi. OK, thanks. Queueing to testing. -- Darren Hart VMware Open Source Technology Center