Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755145AbdFWUgs (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jun 2017 16:36:48 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:50242 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754946AbdFWUgp (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jun 2017 16:36:45 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com 5996875727 Authentication-Results: ext-mx01.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: ext-mx01.extmail.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=vgoyal@redhat.com DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mx1.redhat.com 5996875727 Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 16:36:43 -0400 From: Vivek Goyal To: "Serge E. Hallyn" Cc: Stefan Berger , ebiederm@xmission.com, containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, lkp@01.org, xiaolong.ye@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, tycho@docker.com, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, christian.brauner@mailbox.org, amir73il@gmail.com, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Enable namespaced file capabilities Message-ID: <20170623203643.GC24779@redhat.com> References: <1498157989-11814-1-git-send-email-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20170623200956.GB24779@redhat.com> <20170623201723.GA22857@mail.hallyn.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170623201723.GA22857@mail.hallyn.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.25]); Fri, 23 Jun 2017 20:36:44 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3029 Lines: 87 On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 03:17:23PM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > Quoting Vivek Goyal (vgoyal@redhat.com): > > On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 02:59:46PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote: > > > This series of patches primary goal is to enable file capabilities > > > in user namespaces without affecting the file capabilities that are > > > effective on the host. This is to prevent that any unprivileged user > > > on the host maps his own uid to root in a private namespace, writes > > > the xattr, and executes the file with privilege on the host. > > > > > > We achieve this goal by writing extended attributes with a different > > > name when a user namespace is used. If for example the root user > > > in a user namespace writes the security.capability xattr, the name > > > of the xattr that is actually written is encoded as > > > security.capability@uid=1000 for root mapped to uid 1000 on the host. > > > When listing the xattrs on the host, the existing security.capability > > > as well as the security.capability@uid=1000 will be shown. Inside the > > > namespace only 'security.capability', with the value of > > > security.capability@uid=1000, is visible. > > > > Hi Stefan, > > > > Got a question. If child usernamespace sets a > > security.capability@uid=1000, can any of the parent namespace remove it? > > > > IOW, I set capability from usernamespace and tried to remove it from > > host and that failed. Is that expected. > > > > # Inside usernamespce > > $setcap cat_net_raw+ep foo.txt > > > > # outside user namespace > > $listxattr foo.txt > > xattr: security.capability@uid=1000 > > xattr: security.selinux > > > > # outside user namespace > > setfattr -x security.capability@uid foo.txt > > setfattr: foo.txt: Invalid argument > > > > Doing a strace shows removexattr() failed. May this will need fixing? > > > > removexattr("testfile.txt", "security.capability@uid") = -1 EINVAL > > (Invalid argument) > > That's not the right xattr, though, does > > setfattr -x security.capability@uid=1000 foo.txt > > work? Yep, that works (as root on host). My bad. > > If you are in fact uid=1000 then that should work. Tried setfattr -x as uid 1000 in init_user_ns and that seems to have issues. $ ll testfile.txt -rw-r--r--. 1 vivek vivek 0 Jun 23 15:44 testfile.txt $listxattr testfile.txt xattr: security.capability@uid=1000 xattr: security.selinux $id uid=1000(vivek) gid=1000(vivek) groups=1000(vivek) context=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 $setfattr -x security.capability@uid=1000 testfile.txt setfattr: testfile.txt: Operation not permitted I had to launch a user namespace with 1000 mapped to 0 inside user namespace and then "setfattr -x security.capability testfile.txt" worked. > If you are uid 1001, > and 1000 was delegated to you, then you'll need to create a transient > userns with uid 1000 mapped into it in order to delete it (so that you > have privilege over the uid). Will give this a try. Vivek > > If that doesn't work, then it's a bug. > > -serge