DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mx1.redhat.com EFB7581227
Message-ID: <1498347954.13083.40.camel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] sched,numa: override part of
 migrate_degrades_locality when idle balancing
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jhladky@redhat.com, mgorman@suse.de,
        peterz@infradead.org
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2017 19:45:54 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20170624065830.tuyznoakmzoekvdh@gmail.com>
References: <20170623165530.22514-1-riel@redhat.com>
         <20170623165530.22514-2-riel@redhat.com>
         <20170624065830.tuyznoakmzoekvdh@gmail.com>
Organization: Red Hat, Inc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 955
Lines: 24

On Sat, 2017-06-24 at 08:58 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * riel@redhat.com <riel@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> > 
> > Several tests in the NAS benchmark seem to run a lot slower with
> > NUMA balancing enabled, than with NUMA balancing disabled. The
> > slower run time corresponds with increased idle time.
> > 
> > Overriding the final test of migrate_degrades_locality (but still
> > doing the other NUMA tests first) seems to improve performance
> > of those benchmarks.
> > 
> > Reported-by: Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> 
> Note, I removed the first SOB from the commit, assuming that you only
> meant to 
> include the second one?

Thank you. It looks like I used the wrong email address
in the SOB I wrote in the patch, and git added the second
one automatically. The second one is indeed the one I want.