Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 12:07:42 +0200
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/amd: Suppress IO_PAGE_FAULTs in kdump kernel
Message-ID: <20170626100742.GC3737@suse.de>
References: <1497600901-8993-1-git-send-email-joro@8bytes.org>
 <20170623085719.GD20618@x1>
 <20170623114310.GE20618@x1>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170623114310.GE20618@x1>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 881
Lines: 22

Hi Baoquan,

On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 07:43:10PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> Do you think whether it's necessary to continue my kdump fix of amd iommu
> patchset? Seems my last post was in Jan this year. I know you are very
> busy on fixing bugs and reviewing tons of patches. Without your
> guidance and reviewing, I absolutely can't make it. So I would like to
> hear your suggestions and idea.
> 
> I focused on kaslr issues recently, now most of them have been
> fixed. My boss discussed with me about the next plan. If you have other
> plan, I can sync it to our team about the status of upstream.

Sorry for my silence on the patches, I have not yet found the time to
look deeply into them. I am still interested in them, so how about you
do a rebase/repost after the next merge window and then I will take the
time for a more in depth review and discussion?


Thanks,

	Joerg