Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751920AbdFZOq0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jun 2017 10:46:26 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:58168 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751392AbdFZOqU (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jun 2017 10:46:20 -0400 Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 16:46:11 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: riel@redhat.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jhladky@redhat.com, mingo@kernel.org, mgorman@suse.de Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] sched,fair: remove effective_load Message-ID: <20170626144611.GA5775@worktop> References: <20170623165530.22514-1-riel@redhat.com> <20170623165530.22514-5-riel@redhat.com> <20170626144437.GB4941@worktop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170626144437.GB4941@worktop> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22.1 (2013-10-16) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 573 Lines: 14 On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 04:44:37PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 12:55:30PM -0400, riel@redhat.com wrote: > > From: Rik van Riel > > > > The function effective_load was only used by the NUMA balancing > > code, and not by the regular load balancing code. Now that the > > NUMA balancing code no longer uses it either, get rid of it. > > Hmm,... funny. It used to be used by wake-affine. I'll have to go check > what happened. Ah, it fell pray to that LLC == NUMA confusion from the previous patch. That really looks buggered.