Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751963AbdFZPvJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jun 2017 11:51:09 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:51740 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751426AbdFZPvB (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jun 2017 11:51:01 -0400 Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2017 17:50:57 +0200 From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" To: Greg KH Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" , Julia Lawall , wagi@monom.org, dwmw2@infradead.org, rafal@milecki.pl, arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, yi1.li@linux.intel.com, atull@opensource.altera.com, moritz.fischer@ettus.com, pmladek@suse.com, johannes.berg@intel.com, emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com, luciano.coelho@intel.com, kvalo@codeaurora.org, luto@kernel.org, jkosina@suse.cz, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, keescook@chromium.org, takahiro.akashi@linaro.org, dhowells@redhat.com, pjones@redhat.com, hdegoede@redhat.com, alan@linux.intel.com, tytso@mit.edu, NeilBrown , Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/5] firmware: add extensible driver data params Message-ID: <20170626155057.GB21846@wotan.suse.de> References: <20170605213314.GR8951@wotan.suse.de> <20170605213937.26215-1-mcgrof@kernel.org> <20170605213937.26215-2-mcgrof@kernel.org> <20170613090548.GA31421@kroah.com> <20170613194011.GI27288@wotan.suse.de> <20170617193815.GI2974@kroah.com> <20170619193522.GH21846@wotan.suse.de> <20170623155123.GB3565@kroah.com> <20170623224338.GX21846@wotan.suse.de> <20170624124057.GB10622@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170624124057.GB10622@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 682 Lines: 16 On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 02:40:57PM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 12:43:38AM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > > > It's also blocking real bug fixes and features that people want > > > addressed, which isn't acceptable. > > > > What? What bugs ? I have addressed *every single* stable issue in queue and > > have sent patches for them and they do not depend in any way on any of this > > series! > > Ok, so we are all caught up now with bug fixes? That's good, I was not > aware of that, so nevermind that objection, my fault. Yes. I've been following up on all actively reported bugs and have even implemented better alternatives based on discussions. Luis