Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 2 Nov 2000 03:49:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 2 Nov 2000 03:49:28 -0500 Received: from smtpde02.sap-ag.de ([194.39.131.53]:46832 "EHLO smtpde02.sap-ag.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 2 Nov 2000 03:49:19 -0500 From: Christoph Rohland To: Rik van Riel Cc: Jonathan George , "'matthew@mattshouse.com'" , "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" Subject: Re: 2.4.0-test10 Sluggish After Load In-Reply-To: Organisation: SAP LinuxLab Date: 02 Nov 2000 09:48:39 +0100 In-Reply-To: Rik van Riel's message of "Wed, 1 Nov 2000 14:56:18 -0200 (BRDT)" Message-ID: Lines: 21 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Bryce Canyon) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Rik, On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, Rik van Riel wrote: >> BTW, I think that everyone is happy with the direction of the >> new VM. I'm looking forward to your upcoming enhancements which >> I hope will make it in to a later 2.4 release. > > I'm working on it. I have no idea if it'll be ready in time > for other 2.4 releases ... maybe stuff will be there, maybe > it'll be 2.5 work. > > Of course, this also depends on the amount of people willing > to test out new VM patches and/or help with development. As you know I am doing regular thrash tests and I am willing to do this further. I would hate to see a customer go down because his machine becomes unusable. IMHO we should try to fix this during 2.4. Greetings Christoph - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/