Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 08:52:53 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
        Daniel Wagner <wagi@monom.org>, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
        rafal@milecki.pl, Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, yi1.li@linux.intel.com,
        atull@opensource.altera.com, Moritz Fischer <moritz.fischer@ettus.com>,
        pmladek@suse.com, Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>,
        emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com, luciano.coelho@intel.com,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>, luto@kernel.org,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        "AKASHI, Takahiro" <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>,
        David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>, pjones@redhat.com,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>, alan@linux.intel.com,
        tytso@mit.edu, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: remove request_firmware_into_buf()
Message-ID: <20170627065253.GB29909@kroah.com>
References: <20170623160321.GA19720@kroah.com>
 <CAOCOHw4WYM66itYRmu35_AP9ZMoTvmXMqRmS5LfAcBNAGdZaow@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAOCOHw4WYM66itYRmu35_AP9ZMoTvmXMqRmS5LfAcBNAGdZaow@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1289
Lines: 31

On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 01:22:41PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 9:03 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > As Luis pointed out, there are no in-kernel users of
> > request_firmware_into_buf(), so remove it, and the now unused internal
> > flag, which simplifies the logic around buffer handling a bit.
> >
> 
> This API was implemented to reduce the memory pressure during firmware
> load in the Qualcomm remoteprocs, but it wasn't available when I
> upstreamed that code and I apparently forgot to send out the patch
> moving us over to use this API...
> 
> Especially when loading the Qualcomm modem we have a couple of files
> that we request_firmware() that are 10-15MB in size, so this
> functionality is definitely wanted.
> 
> 
> As we are calling release_firmware() immediately following the
> request_firmware() I did attempt to just call
> kernel_read_file_from_path() directly, but as I don't have access to
> the fw_path[] this becomes inconsistent, so I would like to keep
> request_firmware_into_buf().

Why would we keep it if there is no in-tree user for it?  If you want it
sometime in the future, great, we can revert the deletion then, but
keeping it around for nothing isn't ok, you know that :)

thanks,

greg k-h