Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265496AbTFMT54 (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jun 2003 15:57:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265502AbTFMT54 (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jun 2003 15:57:56 -0400 Received: from phoenix.infradead.org ([195.224.96.167]:60933 "EHLO phoenix.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265496AbTFMT5z (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jun 2003 15:57:55 -0400 Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 21:11:42 +0100 (BST) From: James Simmons To: John Bradford cc: terje_fb@yahoo.no, Subject: Re: Real multi-user linux In-Reply-To: <200306131743.h5DHhNdv000312@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1145 Lines: 27 > > > The next stage will be non PC boards supporting more than > > > one graphics display output. Every now and then you see such a > > > board. I seen a 8 graphics chip board with 8 video outputs. > > > As the number of terminals increases you might want to investigate the > > possibility of terminal driving units connected to the main box, like > > this: > > [snip diagram] > > Of course, those terminal driving units could actually then just be > replaced with multiple-display-and-keyboard-enabled X servers. > > So, instead of trying to add more and more terminals to a single box, > you could stick with four-headed X servers, which would probably be > more scalable. The biggest limitation is the PCI bus. Only so many cards can go in. I guess you could fill the machine up with graphics cards and go with external USB audio and TV tuner cards. One to match each graphics card. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/