Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265519AbTFMUJz (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jun 2003 16:09:55 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265520AbTFMUJz (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jun 2003 16:09:55 -0400 Received: from 81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk ([81.2.122.30]:4224 "EHLO 81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265519AbTFMUJx (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jun 2003 16:09:53 -0400 Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 21:30:34 +0100 From: John Bradford Message-Id: <200306132030.h5DKUYlu000211@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk> To: john@grabjohn.com, jsimmons@infradead.org Subject: Re: Real multi-user linux Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, terje_fb@yahoo.no Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1005 Lines: 22 > > So, instead of trying to add more and more terminals to a single box, > > you could stick with four-headed X servers, which would probably be > > more scalable. > The biggest limitation is the PCI bus. Only so many cards can go in. I > guess you could fill the machine up with graphics cards and go with > external USB audio and TV tuner cards. One to match each graphics card. No need: A single machine can support four displays, keyboards, and mice easily. We can use such machines as X servers for four people. Each one can be connected via Ethernet to the Linux supercomputer. That way you get the cost advantages of the multi-headed setup, with the scalability of the X server setup. I think you could scale to 64 or 128 users like that. John. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/