Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753186AbdF0PCN (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jun 2017 11:02:13 -0400 Received: from mail-lf0-f65.google.com ([209.85.215.65]:36064 "EHLO mail-lf0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752811AbdF0O6W (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Jun 2017 10:58:22 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170627140559.GK14041@arm.com> References: <1498224876-5200-1-git-send-email-gakula@caviumnetworks.com> <20170627135610.GX658@rric.localdomain> <20170627140559.GK14041@arm.com> From: Geetha Akula Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 20:28:14 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Devel] [RESEND PATCH v9 3/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add workaround for Cavium ThunderX2 erratum #126 To: Will Deacon Cc: Robert Richter , Geetha sowjanya , Robin Murphy , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Hanjun Guo , Sudeep Holla , Linux IOMMU , Rob Herring , Charles Garcia-Tobin , Geetha Sowjanya , jcm@redhat.com, Linu Cherian , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Catalin Marinas , Sunil Goutham , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devel@acpica.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2607 Lines: 64 On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 7:36 PM, Will Deacon wrote: > On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 03:56:10PM +0200, Robert Richter wrote: >> On 23.06.17 19:04:36, Geetha sowjanya wrote: >> > From: Geetha Sowjanya >> > >> > Cavium ThunderX2 SMMU doesn't support MSI and also doesn't have unique irq >> > lines for gerror, eventq and cmdq-sync. >> > >> > New named irq "combined" is set as a errata workaround, which allows to >> > share the irq line by register single irq handler for all the interrupts. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Geetha sowjanya >> > --- >> > Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.txt | 1 + >> > .../devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu-v3.txt | 6 + >> > drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 57 ++++++++--- >> > drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 100 ++++++++++++++----- >> > 4 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-) >> >> > +static int arm_smmu_setup_irqs(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu) >> > +{ >> > + int ret, irq; >> > + u32 irqen_flags = IRQ_CTRL_EVTQ_IRQEN | IRQ_CTRL_GERROR_IRQEN; >> > + >> > + /* Disable IRQs first */ >> > + ret = arm_smmu_write_reg_sync(smmu, 0, ARM_SMMU_IRQ_CTRL, >> > + ARM_SMMU_IRQ_CTRLACK); >> > + if (ret) { >> > + dev_err(smmu->dev, "failed to disable irqs\n"); >> > + return ret; >> > + } >> > + >> > + irq = smmu->combined_irq; >> > + if (irq) { >> > + /* >> > + * Cavium ThunderX2 implementation doesn't not support unique >> > + * irq lines. Use single irq line for all the SMMUv3 interrupts. >> > + */ >> > + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(smmu->dev, irq, >> > + arm_smmu_combined_irq_handler, >> > + arm_smmu_combined_irq_thread, >> > + IRQF_ONESHOT, >> >> Without the IRQF_SHARED flag set I see the following on a dual node >> system now: Node1 SMMU interrupts are programmed wrong in the firmware. Node 0 and Node1 SMMU do not share interrupts. I have verified the patch on dual node with correct interrupt numbers programmed in firmware. Thanks, Geetha. > > We asked about that before: > > https://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=149803613513068&w=2 > https://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=149803744713475&w=2 > > and Geetha didn't reply, but the next version of the patch dropped the flag. > Is it just that firmware is misprogramming something here, or something > more fundamental? > > Will