Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264105AbTFNB1C (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jun 2003 21:27:02 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265597AbTFNB1C (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jun 2003 21:27:02 -0400 Received: from gans.physik3.uni-rostock.de ([139.30.44.2]:64396 "EHLO gans.physik3.uni-rostock.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264105AbTFNB1A (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Jun 2003 21:27:00 -0400 Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 03:40:38 +0200 (CEST) From: Tim Schmielau To: george anzinger cc: Clemens Schwaighofer , john stultz , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: uptime wrong in 2.5.70 In-Reply-To: <3EEA3541.4000909@mvista.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 738 Lines: 23 On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, george anzinger wrote: > Clemens Schwaighofer wrote: > > 22:29:47 up 14667 days, 19:08, 3 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 > > Uptime currently reports a conversion of jiffies which is currently > jacked up to a few seconds short of 32 bits worth of jiffies (for > testing purposes). > That would explain being off by 49 days, 17 hours (or 497 days if HZ=100). However, the two reported cases are roughly 295 as much, and I have no clue about that number. Tim - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/