Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S265659AbTFNJRH (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jun 2003 05:17:07 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S265660AbTFNJRG (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jun 2003 05:17:06 -0400 Received: from voyager.st-peter.stw.uni-erlangen.de ([131.188.24.132]:64183 "EHLO voyager.st-peter.stw.uni-erlangen.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S265659AbTFNJRE (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Jun 2003 05:17:04 -0400 X-Mailbox-Line: From galia@st-peter.stw.uni-erlangen.de Sat Jun 14 11:30:51 2003 Message-ID: <1055583051.3eeaeb4b0c7a8@secure.st-peter.stw.uni-erlangen.de> Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 11:30:51 +0200 From: Svetoslav Slavtchev To: James Simmons Cc: Linux console project , Aivils.Stoss@unibanka.lv, andreas@schuldei.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: is Ruby dead ? lkml: Real multi-user linux References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1507 Lines: 39 Quoting James Simmons : > > > I was wonderin what does this post by James Simmons means. > > > > James did you abondon ruby in order to bring something comersial ? > > there are no changes in ruby for a more then 4 monts, > > and ruby is hardly useable/ compilable, and you are talking about > > a production status? > > The 2.5.X version is broken. Instead I have beening working on making > the fbdev layer stable. The api I developed while working on ruby. The > 2.4.X version is quite stable. Alot of the framebuffer drivers could be > dropped onto the 2.4.X ruby kernel and it would work. We do have a few > changes in the framebuffer api that happened but that wouldn't take much > to port to ruby 2.4.X. ruby 2.4.X ? does it exist? there is nothing about ruby-2.4 on the linuxconsole web site, mailing list. are there sources available anywhere? does framebuffer console work in ruby-2.4 > > did i misunderstood something, or you have droped ruby for something > comersial? > > No. I'm still working on ruby. All my 2.5.X is geared toward ruby. where can one get your latest work? linuxconsole's cvs and bitkeeper have no changes since more then 4 months, there where no diffs posted to the mailing list too. Svetljo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/