Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751741AbdF1SMJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jun 2017 14:12:09 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f178.google.com ([209.85.161.178]:34845 "EHLO mail-yw0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751501AbdF1SMC (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Jun 2017 14:12:02 -0400 Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 14:11:59 -0400 From: Tejun Heo To: Jens Axboe , gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Cc: Shaohua Li , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, hch@lst.de, rostedt@goodmis.org, lizefan@huawei.com, Kernel-team@fb.com, Shaohua Li Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 00/12] blktrace: output cgroup info Message-ID: <20170628181159.GB24647@htj.duckdns.org> References: <20170628165316.nozfbdvmpflqwt3f@kernel.org> <15d71514-4f24-0cff-8f85-3e70268fc7a7@kernel.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <15d71514-4f24-0cff-8f85-3e70268fc7a7@kernel.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 825 Lines: 23 Hello, On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 10:54:28AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > >> Series looks fine to me. I don't know how you want to split or funnel it, > >> since it touches multiple different parts. Would it make sense to split this > >> series into two - one for the kernfs changes, and then a subsequent block > >> series that depend on that? > > > > What's the best practice to do this without building errors? Ask Tejun > > to merge the first 7 patches first? > > Yes, and then resend the block patches, just noting that dependency. Then > we can funnel them in like that. I wonder whether it'd be a lot easier to route the whole series through one tree, most likely block. Greg, would that be okay with you? Alternatively, we can route the whole thing through driver tree if Jens is okay with that. Thanks. -- tejun