Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753169AbdF2NGi (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2017 09:06:38 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:57060 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752902AbdF2NGa (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jun 2017 09:06:30 -0400 Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 15:05:26 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Greg KH cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" , mfuzzey@parkeon.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, wagi@monom.org, dwmw2@infradead.org, jewalt@lgsinnovations.com, rafal@milecki.pl, arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, yi1.li@linux.intel.com, atull@kernel.org, moritz.fischer@ettus.com, pmladek@suse.com, johannes.berg@intel.com, emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com, luciano.coelho@intel.com, kvalo@codeaurora.org, luto@kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, keescook@chromium.org, takahiro.akashi@linaro.org, dhowells@redhat.com, pjones@redhat.com, hdegoede@redhat.com, alan@linux.intel.com, tytso@mit.edu, mtk.manpages@gmail.com, paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, mtosatti@redhat.com, mawilcox@microsoft.com, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "stable # 4 . 6" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] swait: add the missing killable swaits In-Reply-To: <20170629125402.GH26046@kroah.com> Message-ID: References: <20170614222017.14653-1-mcgrof@kernel.org> <20170614222017.14653-3-mcgrof@kernel.org> <20170629125402.GH26046@kroah.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 286 Lines: 10 On Thu, 29 Jun 2017, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 03:20:15PM -0700, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > Do you really still want to add these, now that we know we shouldn't be > using swait in "real" code? :) And who defined that it should not be used in real code? Thanks, tglx