Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752041AbdF3MMV (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jun 2017 08:12:21 -0400 Received: from mail-it0-f42.google.com ([209.85.214.42]:35322 "EHLO mail-it0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751951AbdF3MMO (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Jun 2017 08:12:14 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170629214343.882576048@linutronix.de> References: <20170629213334.375848050@linutronix.de> <20170629214343.882576048@linutronix.de> From: Linus Walleij Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2017 14:12:12 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [patch 1/5] pinctrl: samsung: Remove bogus irq_[un]mask from resource management To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: LKML , Marc Zyngier , Brian Norris , Heiko Stuebner , "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." , Julia Cartwright , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , John Keeping , Doug Anderson , Tomasz Figa , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Sylwester Nawrocki , Kukjin Kim , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , linux-samsung-soc Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1099 Lines: 31 On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 11:33 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > The irq chip callbacks irq_request/release_resources() have absolutely no > business with masking and unmasking the irq. > > The core code unmasks the interrupt after complete setup and masks it > before invoking irq_release_resources(). > > The unmask is actually harmful as it happens before the interrupt is > completely initialized in __setup_irq(). > > Remove it. > > Fixes: f6a8249f9e55 ("pinctrl: exynos: Lock GPIOs as interrupts when used as EINTs") > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner > Cc: Tomasz Figa > Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski > Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki > Cc: Linus Walleij > Cc: Kukjin Kim > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij Does this patch have a dependency on the rest of the series or should I just apply it as-is? Yours, Linus Walleij