Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753057AbdFSSiT (ORCPT + 2 others); Mon, 19 Jun 2017 14:38:19 -0400 Received: from wtarreau.pck.nerim.net ([62.212.114.60]:52606 "EHLO 1wt.eu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753876AbdFSSiQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jun 2017 14:38:16 -0400 From: Willy Tarreau To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, linux@roeck-us.net Cc: Peter Zijlstra , juri.lelli@arm.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de, xlpang@redhat.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, jdesfossez@efficios.com, dvhart@infradead.org, bristot@redhat.com, Thomas Gleixner , Willy Tarreau Subject: [PATCH 3.10 185/268] futex: Fix potential use-after-free in FUTEX_REQUEUE_PI Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 20:31:24 +0200 Message-Id: <1497897167-14556-186-git-send-email-w@1wt.eu> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.8.0.rc2.1.gbe9624a In-Reply-To: <1497897167-14556-1-git-send-email-w@1wt.eu> References: <1497897167-14556-1-git-send-email-w@1wt.eu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: From: Peter Zijlstra commit c236c8e95a3d395b0494e7108f0d41cf36ec107c upstream. While working on the futex code, I stumbled over this potential use-after-free scenario. Dmitry triggered it later with syzkaller. pi_mutex is a pointer into pi_state, which we drop the reference on in unqueue_me_pi(). So any access to that pointer after that is bad. Since other sites already do rt_mutex_unlock() with hb->lock held, see for example futex_lock_pi(), simply move the unlock before unqueue_me_pi(). Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Reviewed-by: Darren Hart Cc: juri.lelli@arm.com Cc: bigeasy@linutronix.de Cc: xlpang@redhat.com Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org Cc: mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com Cc: jdesfossez@efficios.com Cc: dvhart@infradead.org Cc: bristot@redhat.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170304093558.801744246@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau --- kernel/futex.c | 20 +++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c index 9bbeda0..01a72fc 100644 --- a/kernel/futex.c +++ b/kernel/futex.c @@ -2413,7 +2413,6 @@ static int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags, { struct hrtimer_sleeper timeout, *to = NULL; struct rt_mutex_waiter rt_waiter; - struct rt_mutex *pi_mutex = NULL; struct futex_hash_bucket *hb; union futex_key key2 = FUTEX_KEY_INIT; struct futex_q q = futex_q_init; @@ -2502,6 +2501,8 @@ static int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags, spin_unlock(q.lock_ptr); } } else { + struct rt_mutex *pi_mutex; + /* * We have been woken up by futex_unlock_pi(), a timeout, or a * signal. futex_unlock_pi() will not destroy the lock_ptr nor @@ -2525,18 +2526,19 @@ static int futex_wait_requeue_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, unsigned int flags, if (res) ret = (res < 0) ? res : 0; + /* + * If fixup_pi_state_owner() faulted and was unable to handle + * the fault, unlock the rt_mutex and return the fault to + * userspace. + */ + if (ret && rt_mutex_owner(pi_mutex) == current) + rt_mutex_unlock(pi_mutex); + /* Unqueue and drop the lock. */ unqueue_me_pi(&q); } - /* - * If fixup_pi_state_owner() faulted and was unable to handle the - * fault, unlock the rt_mutex and return the fault to userspace. - */ - if (ret == -EFAULT) { - if (pi_mutex && rt_mutex_owner(pi_mutex) == current) - rt_mutex_unlock(pi_mutex); - } else if (ret == -EINTR) { + if (ret == -EINTR) { /* * We've already been requeued, but cannot restart by calling * futex_lock_pi() directly. We could restart this syscall, but -- 2.8.0.rc2.1.gbe9624a