Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752156AbdGAT6H (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Jul 2017 15:58:07 -0400 Received: from g4t3427.houston.hpe.com ([15.241.140.73]:56614 "EHLO g4t3427.houston.hpe.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751922AbdGAT6G (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Jul 2017 15:58:06 -0400 Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2017 13:58:05 -0600 From: Jerry Hoemann To: Dan Williams Cc: "linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] libnvdimm, acpi, nfit: Add bus level dsm mask for pass thru. Message-ID: <20170701195805.GA13259@anatevka.americas.hpqcorp.net> Reply-To: Jerry.Hoemann@hpe.com References: <293ee143dcabb386ca06b384a384171c256a2ecc.1498810220.git.jerry.hoemann@hpe.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2251 Lines: 52 On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 08:55:22PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: ... > On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Jerry Hoemann wrote: > > + if (cmd == ND_CMD_CALL) > > + dsm_mask = nd_desc->bus_dsm_mask; > > desc = nd_cmd_bus_desc(cmd); > > uuid = to_nfit_uuid(NFIT_DEV_BUS); > > handle = adev->handle; > > @@ -1613,6 +1615,7 @@ static void acpi_nfit_init_dsms(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc) > > struct nvdimm_bus_descriptor *nd_desc = &acpi_desc->nd_desc; > > const u8 *uuid = to_nfit_uuid(NFIT_DEV_BUS); > > struct acpi_device *adev; > > + unsigned long dsm_mask; > > int i; > > > > nd_desc->cmd_mask = acpi_desc->bus_cmd_force_en; > > @@ -1624,6 +1627,11 @@ static void acpi_nfit_init_dsms(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc) > > if (acpi_check_dsm(adev->handle, uuid, 1, 1ULL << i)) > > set_bit(i, &nd_desc->cmd_mask); > > set_bit(ND_CMD_CALL, &nd_desc->cmd_mask); > > + > > + dsm_mask = 0x3bf; > > I went ahead and fixed this up to use dsm_mask defined like this: > > + dsm_mask = > + (1 << ND_CMD_ARS_CAP) | > + (1 << ND_CMD_ARS_START) | > + (1 << ND_CMD_ARS_STATUS) | > + (1 << ND_CMD_CLEAR_ERROR) | > + (1 << NFIT_CMD_TRANSLATE_SPA) | > + (1 << NFIT_CMD_ARS_INJECT_SET) | > + (1 << NFIT_CMD_ARS_INJECT_CLEAR) | > + (1 << NFIT_CMD_ARS_INJECT_GET); > > This drops function number 0 which userspace has no need to call. Actually I like to call function 0. Its an excellent test when modifying the code path as its a no side effects function whose output is known in advance and instantly recognizable. I also use it when testing new firmware. What is the downside to allowing it? What bad things happen? Also, I do have to ask why you allow function zero for NVDIMM_FAMILY_MSFT? -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Jerry Hoemann Software Engineer Hewlett Packard Enterprise -----------------------------------------------------------------------------