Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752944AbdGCLfZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jul 2017 07:35:25 -0400 Received: from hqemgate14.nvidia.com ([216.228.121.143]:19139 "EHLO hqemgate14.nvidia.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752114AbdGCLfY (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Jul 2017 07:35:24 -0400 X-PGP-Universal: processed; by hqpgpgate101.nvidia.com on Mon, 03 Jul 2017 04:35:23 -0700 Subject: Re: [PATCH] devfreq: tegra: fix error code in tegra_devfreq_probe() To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" , MyungJoo Ham , Kyungmin Park , Chanwoo Choi , Thierry Reding CC: , , References: <20170630072211.GA21867@embeddedgus> From: Jon Hunter Message-ID: <89de541e-355e-e79c-0090-cffefd277b4c@nvidia.com> Date: Mon, 3 Jul 2017 12:35:18 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170630072211.GA21867@embeddedgus> X-Originating-IP: [10.26.11.121] X-ClientProxiedBy: UKMAIL101.nvidia.com (10.26.138.13) To UKMAIL101.nvidia.com (10.26.138.13) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1032 Lines: 38 On 30/06/17 08:22, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > Print and propagate the return value of platform_get_irq on failure. > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva > --- > drivers/devfreq/tegra-devfreq.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/tegra-devfreq.c b/drivers/devfreq/tegra-devfreq.c > index 214fff9..ae71215 100644 > --- a/drivers/devfreq/tegra-devfreq.c > +++ b/drivers/devfreq/tegra-devfreq.c > @@ -688,9 +688,9 @@ static int tegra_devfreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > } > > irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0); > - if (irq <= 0) { > - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get IRQ\n"); > - return -ENODEV; > + if (irq < 0) { The changelog does not describe the above change and if/why this is ok. However, the original test looks fine to me and so I don't see a need to change this. > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get IRQ: %d\n", irq); > + return irq; Why not have ... return irq ? irq : -ENODEV; Cheers Jon -- nvpublic