Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263777AbTFPMVI (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jun 2003 08:21:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263837AbTFPMVI (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jun 2003 08:21:08 -0400 Received: from mail.ithnet.com ([217.64.64.8]:27660 "HELO heather.ithnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S263777AbTFPMVH (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Jun 2003 08:21:07 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 14:34:51 +0200 From: Stephan von Krawczynski To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: marcelo@conectiva.com.br, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Re: BUG REPORT: Massive performance drop in routing throughput with 2.4.21 Message-Id: <20030616143451.26d3de7e.skraw@ithnet.com> In-Reply-To: <20030616141806.6a92f839.skraw@ithnet.com> References: <20030616141806.6a92f839.skraw@ithnet.com> Organization: ith Kommunikationstechnik GmbH X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.2 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 613 Lines: 15 Additional information: I found another setup which has the same problem reproducable. Since this is no production unit I can test patches. It may be important to the problem that there are _three_ network cards, as the test-setup shows no degression in simple 1-1 through routing but using a third network card ot the same box makes it woe. Hope this helps. Stephan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/